Skip to content

rm chainlink-aptos import by using codec module#23065

Merged
jmank88 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
rm-aptos-dep
Jul 10, 2026
Merged

rm chainlink-aptos import by using codec module#23065
jmank88 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
rm-aptos-dep

Conversation

@jmank88

@jmank88 jmank88 commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR removes the (direct) import of chainlink-aptos, by completing the switch to use the codec module instead.

Notice there is still an indirect import due to chainlink-sui depending on aptos.

Requires:

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I see you updated files related to core. Please run make gocs in the root directory to add a changeset as well as in the text include at least one of the following tags:

  • #added For any new functionality added.
  • #breaking_change For any functionality that requires manual action for the node to boot.
  • #bugfix For bug fixes.
  • #changed For any change to the existing functionality.
  • #db_update For any feature that introduces updates to database schema.
  • #deprecation_notice For any upcoming deprecation functionality.
  • #internal For changesets that need to be excluded from the final changelog.
  • #nops For any feature that is NOP facing and needs to be in the official Release Notes for the release.
  • #removed For any functionality/config that is removed.
  • #updated For any functionality that is updated.
  • #wip For any change that is not ready yet and external communication about it should be held off till it is feature complete.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ No conflicts with other open PRs targeting develop

pavel-raykov
pavel-raykov previously approved these changes Jul 9, 2026
@trunk-io

trunk-io Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Static BadgeStatic BadgeStatic BadgeStatic Badge

View Full Report ↗︎Docs

JohnChangUK
JohnChangUK previously approved these changes Jul 9, 2026
@jmank88 jmank88 dismissed stale reviews from JohnChangUK and pavel-raykov via 23de076 July 9, 2026 17:36
@jmank88 jmank88 marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2026 17:37
@jmank88 jmank88 requested review from a team as code owners July 9, 2026 17:37
@jmank88 jmank88 enabled auto-merge July 9, 2026 17:37
@jmank88 jmank88 requested review from a team as code owners July 9, 2026 17:58
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CORA - Analysis Skipped

Reason: The number of code owners (4) is less than the minimum required (5) and/or the number of CODEOWNERS entries with changed files (5) is less than the minimum required (2).

JohnChangUK
JohnChangUK previously approved these changes Jul 9, 2026
@jmank88 jmank88 requested a review from ogtownsend July 9, 2026 18:55
pavel-raykov
pavel-raykov previously approved these changes Jul 9, 2026
@jmank88 jmank88 requested a review from KodeyThomas July 9, 2026 19:20
ogtownsend
ogtownsend previously approved these changes Jul 9, 2026
@jmank88 jmank88 added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 9, 2026
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Jul 9, 2026
@jmank88 jmank88 dismissed stale reviews from ogtownsend, pavel-raykov, and JohnChangUK via 1b8e5e4 July 9, 2026 20:34
@jmank88 jmank88 enabled auto-merge July 9, 2026 20:34
@jmank88

jmank88 commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Strange unit test failure left behind 🤔
WASM test but db tx failure that is repeatable. And I can't run the tests locally for some reason
Edit: Rebase fixed it 🤷

@cl-sonarqube-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jmank88 jmank88 added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 10, 2026
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 5b4ddf7 Jul 10, 2026
251 of 283 checks passed
@jmank88 jmank88 deleted the rm-aptos-dep branch July 10, 2026 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants